Feedback from past participants
Note: These are excerpts from private messages
not specifically written for publication.
On the conference
Zornitsa Kozareva, 2006: I want very much to visit CICLing. I know that it is a very-very high-level conference and I don't know if I will be lucky to have a paper accepted there, but I will try because I know it is worth effort.
Nicolas Nicolov, 2005: CICLing is shaping as a strong conference!
Yunqing Xia, 2005: CICLing is now amongst the most important NLP/CL events.
Ted Pedersen, 2003: One final thing to keep in mind - CICLING is relatively small compared to ACL, etc. Having well known invited speakers (Wilks, Sag, etc) is actually quite different, because the regular conference attendees actually have a chance to spend a bit of time with these famous folks. That doesn't happen at bigger events, where the famous people are burdened with many friends, admirers. So while it's true that people may have seen Wilks speak, they probably have not had a drink or dinner with him. So that's an argument in favor of having well known speakers at CICLING. It's actually one of the things I've enjoyed the most. For example, at a big linguistics conference I'm sure that Igor Melchuk and I would say "hello" and perhaps not much more. Same would be true of Yorick Wilks, etc. But at CICLING I've actually spent fairly large amounts of time with them, and I think others have had the same experience. Having just come from ACL, where I didn't even have time to talk with people I know well, I can attest that this is pretty valuable. And it's why it's good when the invited people participate in the excurions, dinners, etc. So anyway, as I said in my last note I think CICLING has been done pretty well, so I wouldn't think in terms of a major overhaul. And if someone very famous like Pustejovsky is willing to come, I think that's a very nice opportunity for all of us (you included!) to get to know him a bit better than is normally possible.